Does this pick the best technology stack?

There is no universally best stack. The explorer compares plausible options against the constraints you provide and labels the leading direction as provisional.

Why do I need to answer every constraint first?

A technology choice without product, team, change, data, integration, experience, and delivery context hides the trade-offs that matter.

Is the Decision Note final?

No. Edit it with evidence from a small technical spike, keep the open questions visible, and use the revisit trigger instead of treating the choice as permanent.

Product decision lab

Architecture Trade-off Explorer

State the real constraints first, then compare three defensible paths with their costs, assumptions, and revisit triggers.

Choose an architecture the team can actually deliver by making product context and boundary costs explicit before naming technology.

Approximate completion time: About 4 minutes

Front-end experience at HiWeb and Tat Bikeran
Public portfolio source on GitHub
Independent web products documented in the résumé
Persian and English portfolio

0 of 7 constraints recorded0%

Constraints before technology

Complete the decision context

No stack or architecture path appears until all seven constraints are explicit.

0 of 7 complete

Product typeThe main experience, not every future channel.Delivery teamPeople who will actively change and release the product.Rate of changeHow often core workflows are expected to move.Data sensitivityChoose the strongest real constraint, not a hypothetical one.IntegrationsPayment, CRM, ERP, identity, partner APIs, and similar systems.Team experienceProduction ownership matters more than tutorial familiarity.Delivery priorityThe priority that should win when two options are close.

Every field is needed for a meaningful comparison.